Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Each individual becomes who he or she is with the accomplishments and failures of his or her own. Thus, the importance of the path he or she went through plays a crucial role in the years ahead. In this sense, since I believe that knowledge about the past gives humans in general and rulers in specific a wide perspective and strong character, I strongly believe that having an idea about the past plays a crucial role in the future of people.
Firstly, it should be mentioned that each person lives only once, and he or she should spend this precious span of time wisely to be able to have a fruitful and happy life. One of the most important factors to this end is to learn from the mistakes of past, which eventually will make people more mature. What mature people do successfully is to draw lessons from the past and respond to new events accordingly. Actually the ability of inference mainly depends on this factor. If a person is evaluating his or her past, calculating the mistakes, wrongdoings and errors, he or she will probably be more careful the next time he or she faces a similar situation. For example, we are witnessing a terrible time interval in history, which is hindering our basic social needs; we can't even leave our houses, let alone come together with the ones we love. The question is, who will overcome this hardship? The ones not wearing mask, and not social distancing people? Apparently, people who know about the past, and not far away past like Spanish Flu or Chicken Pox time. A couple of years ago we had Pig Flu, Bird Flu and many other kind of diseases, and as people who witnessed that era is acting more carefully nowadays. Because they know that, his phenomenon can get out of control if not taken seriously. Because they saw the peril before and now moving accordingly.
Secondly, we should also consider the issue in the international level, since government representatives are also human beings. But in this case, the effects of their decisions are not confined to them only. They concern millions of people. For example, economic policies are one of the most important factors for voters to determine the ruler for a specific period of time. What shapes the ideas of these voters, then? According to what, do they choose a candidate? Above all, how did the candidates become successful to be candidates? Because becoming a candidate is much more difficult than becoming the winner. Because in the final there are only a handful of people, yet for candidacy there are many more people competing. A candidate is the one who beat them all and come that far. Can a person whose knowledge about the economic history is scanty can be a candidate? Not a chance. If he or she does not have an idea about what happened in the past, can have any opinion on how to handle recent problems? Because the society is more or less the same, hence, the problems of the past and the upcoming ones. In the end, in any political race, if we look at the candidates they are all knowledgeable people, who have a saying about the past of the society. Actually it is this ability that gives them the courage to deal with possible problems if they are chosen.
However, there were always people mentioning about redundancy of the past, complaining about history lessons, degrading historical figures, and there will always be. If we look at the numbers of this kind of people, they are always a minority and that is it. They are incapable of having enough power to make themselves heard, since they are always marginal and ideas they support mainly does not attract mainstream media since they lack logic. All in all, it can be said without hesitation that people who care to learn about his or her past is inclined to be more successful in the life ahead.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...is hindering our basic social needs; we cant even leave our houses, let alone come t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s to determine the ruler for a specific period of time. What shapes the ideas of these voters,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tes become successful to be candidates? Because becoming a candidate is much more diffi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
.... Because in the final there are only a handful of people, yet for candidacy there are ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, apparently, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, in general, kind of, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 33.0505617978 206% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3116.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 668.0 442.535393258 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66467065868 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08386624201 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52016500817 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 312.0 215.323595506 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467065868263 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1010.7 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.10617977528 386% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2077481382 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0285714286 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0857142857 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11521868761 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285842414311 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328186546492 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074512189344 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186000108345 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.