The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Analysis of factors of enhancing societies’ well-being has been actively conducted and it includes various aspects from incomes to free education levels. Although questioning authority by many people has also suggested as enhancing the well-being of society, it does not seem true.
Firstly, trusting authority is beneficial in the enhancement of societies’ well-being. Questioning what authority is doing might mean people are doubting about authority. When someone is doubted by others, they cannot wholly focus on their works, but they are distracted. The works of government, supporting the entire society, is not easy at all and requires high concentrations. If they are distracted by many questions from people, they will need to put extra effort into explaining those doubts are not true. Hence, when people question authority too much, society will be harder to enhance their well-being.
Secondly, too much questioning to authority can make it vacillate. Government is where working for its society and those who work there are always trying to listen to what many people are saying. When a government is about to start implementing a new policy, if people always question anything even for trivial, it will not be able to conduct it and they need to change many parts of what they planned. If it happens often, the government might eventually forgo trying somewhat new that seems beneficial to society’s well-being, and further enhancement might be hard. Therefore, excessive questioning of authority is undesirable.
On the other hand, there is a possibility of unfair works by the government when there is no questioning from people. In order to improve the well-being, those who work for a society has to be incorrupt. However, as they are human beings, they can be easily tempted by self-interesting choices if they think there is no one who watches what they do. Hence, it seems a certain amount of questions are required but it should not necessarily be many.
To sum up, although some questions from people who are engaged in society are necessary, excessive questions will be detrimental to society. Therefore, in order to enhance the well-being of a society, people will need to question only for significant matters about authority.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...at authority is doing might mean people are doubting about authority. When someone is doubte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'happens'.
Suggestion: often happens
... many parts of what they planned. If it happens often, the government might eventually forgo ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2679558011 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9666514846 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483425414365 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2644932976 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.368421053 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224385852585 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885094995794 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517197319968 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151567156639 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031460620871 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...at authority is doing might mean people are doubting about authority. When someone is doubte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'happens'.
Suggestion: often happens
... many parts of what they planned. If it happens often, the government might eventually forgo ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2679558011 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9666514846 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483425414365 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2644932976 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.368421053 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224385852585 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885094995794 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517197319968 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151567156639 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031460620871 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.