The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Only by having a glimpse in today's news articles can we realize that the contemporary world is filled with countless controversies and changes throughout all parts of life. Even though, on the surface it may seem that we are living in a convenient life with systemized order, ceaseless inquiries and participation in politics by the citizens have been changing the world significantly. This essay is going to demonstrate the aspects of the anti-authoritative movements that are being held in various forms.
Firstly, as authority has its flaws within, movements against the power is imperative in order not to let the society fall into corruptcy. Looking back to our modernized civilization, the systems of society have radically changed through collective movements and protests. For instance, not to mention the Spring of Prague, 68 revolution, Black movements and the major Feminism waves, striking ideas in order to solve the current problems, acquisition of civil rights, and turning over the corrupt system that aggravates corruption were all being done by numerous collective movements that happened within the urbanized cities. Especially, the civil rights of minority groups of people were surprisingly enhanced throughout recent centuries. In other words, it can be proudly said that society could be enhanced not by achievements done by a handful of intellectuals but by the whole community who had committed time and effort in taking part in political actions.
Nevertheless, ongoing controversy due to ceaseless riots and protests may be harmful as well as they can cause disorder and a high proportion of criminal deeds. When the power loses its control and the social structure is in precarious condition, then people who have been willing to take any advantage from the common goods are likely to commit crimes. Further, violence tends to occur and people in the most marginal groups may become the biggest victims in the end. Thus, it is not always useful and encouraged to take part in anti-authoritative actions when it is not alarming enough to raise the particular issue.
For instance, the recent riots by pro-conservationists and Neo Nazis in the United States resulted in severe damage to public goods and human resources. Also, some terrorists’ attack in several urbanized spots had also been committed as an action of collapsing the government that is arguably corrupted. Even though for those who are participants it may be an imminent issue that needs to be changed in practice, it hampers the basic standard of safety by destabilizing the well-being of the citizens. Thus, such movements should always be done in awareness of the risks of mistakenly taking innocent lives and should be proceeded only when the authority is doing more harm than it is removed. In other words, order is indispensable in most cases and people need to have a shelter where they are protected enough.
In conclusion, the statement needs to be reconsidered in terms of the potential damages that those movements can cause although their achievements may lead to a radical change and emancipation of groups of the oppressed. That is, even though this essay acknowledges the significance and the necessity of collective anti-authority movements, it does argue that the recklessness of these actions could harm the community by accelerating disorder and violence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...guably corrupted. Even though for those who are participants it may be an imminent iss...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...though for those who are participants it may be an imminent issue that needs to b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in most cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2835.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26951672862 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08193965107 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 883.8 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7731062702 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.210526316 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3157894737 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226051269838 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061723513745 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502201824837 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111929654328 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639533893872 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 100.480337079 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.