When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Old building whisper to us in the creaking of a floorboard and rattling of windowpanes”. I am completely consonant with the prompt to some extent. Throughout time, it has been seen that there are a tremendous amount of examples where the old building is retrofitted or they are used for the modern purposes dictated by the modern planners the plethora of the modern development activities can be carried out in an efficient as well as effective way. For the nation to move towards the apogee of the development the primacy or priority should be given to modern development instead of preservation of the historic buildings.
Throughout history; it is blatant that because of the precedence to the modern development the people of the country and as well as the nation itself is regaling the success. In addition to the precedence of modern development, there are a plethora of examples such as in America which is one of the most developed countries in the world they always render their prime focus on the modern development as planned by the modern planners. Similarly, the focus is not redoubled in the field of giving precedence to the historical monuments. So that, a nation is achieving the feat of the success all the people are having the prosperous life. Had the precedence of the modern development not been prioritized they would not have a wonderful life and achieve the taste of success they are achieving now and “The Swords of Damocles” would be hanging over their heads.
Likewise, in our society where the precedence is given to the modern development the society is marching towards the path of the development. In the light of modern development, any developmental activities can only be achieved if the modern development activities are not thwarted and there are no impediments. Additionally, in the neighboring society of my locality, there is always precedence to the historical building as a result of this many people are devoid of many facilities various types of people are not content and then there is a commotion as well as tiff among the people resulting in this subject matters because of the partisan nature of their leader.
However, some people may argue and contend that it is the historical building because which the nation will be marched towards the apogee of development because this building resembles the sense of unity among the people as well as it is the best way to flourish tourism industry. Throughout history, there are ample amounts of examples such as countries like Greece where prime importance is always given to the historical monuments they are achieving success and having a wonderful life. Moreover, this case is not always true.
So, to march towards the path of development for any nation the empirical amount of importance as well as the precedence should always be given to modern development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...a floorboard and rattling of windowpanes”. I am completely consonant with the pro...
^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...s been seen that there are a tremendous amount of examples where the old building is r...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, may, moreover, similarly, so, then, well, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99790794979 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8916379745 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403765690377 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.7145361029 60.3974514979 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.3125 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34784792716 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119523043365 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899838450993 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2175433146 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873211133861 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.