While most of the environmental problems we face result from the use of technology, society must depend upon the technology to find solutions to these problems.
The author presents the paradox between environmental problems we can and the method through which we are finding the solution of these problems. Although I agree with both the statements, there is minor correction in the first statement. To resolve this paradox I have explained the some resaons below.
First of all, The use of technology is not the reason of most of enviromental problems we are facing. But The overuse or we can say inproper use of technology is the reason of environmental problems. For example, We know that in mordan we find many medicine and vaccine of various disease through which we are now able to save many humans life which is benificial for us. Further By use of technology today we have find many ways to save animals from various disease and even. These are the proper use of technology.
Secondly, Use of technolgy has improved our lifestyle make it efficient and even productive. Give us the knowledge of environment and how to protact and even many easy ways through ecah and every individual can save the environment at some extant. For example, Various research and finding suggest us that we should grow minimum 2-5 plants each year and try to keep planting trees in our houses too. Hence, Technolgy is the way to find the way to solve the environment problems.
Then what is the source of environmental problems? Well, It is human greediness and careless nature. Same as other things in the world even the use technolgy has two sides.
We humans take it as a advantage and runing the our environment. Our excess use of vehicles, factories and other technological facilities is the reason of environmental problems. We can not blame technology but we should blame our greediness and careless nature.
In conclusion, The use of technolgy is benifical and required to keep world forwarding but at the same time awareness of how to use and how much to use should must understand by us to solve the environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...solve this paradox I have explained the some resaons below. First of all, The use...
^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun medicine seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much medicine', 'a good deal of medicine'.
Suggestion: much medicine; a good deal of medicine
...example, We know that in mordan we find many medicine and vaccine of various disease through ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ough which we are now able to save many humans life which is benificial for us. Furthe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'found'.
Suggestion: found
...ther By use of technology today we have find many ways to save animals from various ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nvironmental problems? Well, It is human greediness and careless nature. Same as ...
^^
Line 8, column 22, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gy has two sides. We humans take it as a advantage and runing the our environmen...
^
Line 8, column 45, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
...umans take it as a advantage and runing the our environment. Our excess use of vehicles...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86904761905 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81501053232 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467261904762 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5687967304 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1052631579 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307134866856 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102556115551 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892315943532 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154116535574 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831372950146 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.