Women are deprived of tasks because of having physical differences with men
Issue topic simply states that because men and women having physical differences they are not equally treated for many tasks. This statement also indirectly states that evenif many women are more intellectual than most men for the particular task they are deprived of the job because of their physical difference. The statement itself is a disgrace to some extent if we calculate the caliber of any human not the basis of their physcial differences. Women of today's world are equally intelligent than most of the men.
I agree men and women have physical differences and when it comes to women, their safety should be given utmost priority. Tasks such as firefighters, people working near furnace, etc., if the statement refers to such jobs then its not totally wrong as this jobs are vulnerable to their life. There are many incidences of people getting hurt in such jobs and we cannot risk a women's life as she plays a very crucial role in her family. If the statement refers to such jobs than to some extent I don't think it can be criticized. Even many lifes of men are in danger in such jobs and they are incidences where such things have happened and people have lost their loved ones.
But in jobs such as head of department of any sector such as finance, engineering, management, doctors,etc., are depriving women because of physical differences then in such case injustice is being done. No work can be categorized into types because of physical differences. In our history, there were many women because of which we have got independence and their sacrifices and still remembered. For Example: In Indian revolution, there was a time when women were not allowed to complete their schooling, because of the sacrifices made by Savirtribai Phule today the Indian girls are able to take education. In our democracy, we also have a 'right to equality' if our democracy is being impartial then why is still inequality being done.
In todays world, while recruiting for a job there are a set of criterias the applicant has to fulfill in such cases if a men does fulfill and a women doesn't qualify and the men is being recruited then they he his being chosen for passing the criteria and this is fair, but if the men doesn't fulfil the criteria and the women does but still that men was selected then this is injustice and the women was unnecessarily deprived for her job just because she had physical differences.
The statement itself is incomplete and has many flaws to be taken care of. If the statement was supported with some example or maybe what particular task, if they would have specified that then it would have been easier to understand the meaning. But as I have stated they are normally two cases here, one in which the job is actually dangerous and other case is where women are purposely being destituted on the basis of physical differences.
However, still those cases would have been easier to evaluate if the statement would have been supported with more data so as to clearly know what it is particularly referring. Hence, they are many flaws in the statement that needs to be taken care of so as to come on one conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... the statement refers to such jobs then its not totally wrong as this jobs are vuln...
^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lays a very crucial role in her family. If the statement refers to such jobs than ...
^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...fers to such jobs than to some extent I dont think it can be criticized. Even many l...
^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
...inance, engineering, management, doctors,etc., are depriving women because of physic...
^^^^
Line 6, column 122, Rule ID: MAN_MEN[1]
Message: 'man' is the singular form of 'men'. Consider using 'man'?
Suggestion: man
...icant has to fulfill in such cases if a men does fulfill and a women doesnt qualify...
^^^
Line 6, column 143, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...in such cases if a men does fulfill and a women doesnt qualify and the men is being rec...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 151, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cases if a men does fulfill and a women doesnt qualify and the men is being recruited ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 285, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...iteria and this is fair, but if the men doesnt fulfil the criteria and the women does ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 164, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had specified'?
Suggestion: had specified
... or maybe what particular task, if they would have specified that then it would have been easier to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 80, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...een easier to evaluate if the statement would have been supported with more data so as to clear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 121, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ould have been supported with more data so as to clearly know what it is particularly re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 253, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...tatement that needs to be taken care of so as to come on one conclusion.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, while, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 45.0 19.5258426966 230% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2607.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 549.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74863387978 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6064485434 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424408014572 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 852.3 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.7892184368 60.3974514979 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.35 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.45 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374785869659 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120691880163 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101890027942 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203144355164 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080995104413 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.