Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In any field nowadays, experts who guide and mentor a novice, pulls their potential outside to make them understand and contribute to the work. As per the claim the statement is true that beginner is contributing more to an organisation or a field then an expert in that field. This statement is not always true, but it has happened and happening even now in many field, were entry level people contribute to their team then the managing authorities. Remarkably this incident has happened not only in organisations and companies, also in research and arts. Which also makes us startling when we come to know that history has a lot of place where this has happened.
During the world war II, where photography and reporting of the war was sensationally appraised. D.W Griffins an expert in photography showcased the war with his photographical skills. However, if we keenly observe the history, Grffins was a person who was organising the photography during that time and analysing the pros and cons of their employees, two people who joined as an employee in his organisation took all the pictures in the war. He guided them through the process, but the contribution and efforts where by the people who took the photographs. The works of those people got immense appreciation and it was commendable.
Similarly, in research field where the experts who have multiple doctorates hold myriad of ideas and wealthy experience in the relative field, mentor their fellow people to work for the results they have predicted. By time, they start working under their guidance and expertise, where people also come up with their own ideas to frame the final results. Such contributions were numerous in the field Computers, Manufacturing, Research and Innovation, and Management.
Recent practices like students' Internship programs, Fellowship program to help students come in the early stages of their life. One example in my office, where I was mentoring two people in a project. Initial period of mentoring and teaching the technicalities of the project and numerous operations involved in the background, is the work as a mentor I possess. In addition, providing them their own work and making them understand what they are doing. Once they start working for the project, enthusiastic people used to put their own ideas achieve the fruition. They have contributed immensely to the project and also came with innovative ideas to make the project much better. Where expert in any field guiding their subordinate, even though the basics fundamentals were taught and nurtured by an expert in particular field, beginners are the ones who contribute to turn theoretical fundamentals into practical working components.
In conclusion, I accept with the claim that beginners are more likely to make important contributions to the field than an expert. However an expert should guide them in an deterministic fashion to makes results likely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun field seems to be countable; consider using: 'many fields'.
Suggestion: many fields
... has happened and happening even now in many field, were entry level people contribute to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 558, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d companies, also in research and arts. Which also makes us startling when we come to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: W
... the war was sensationally appraised. D.W Griffins an expert in photography showc...
^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereby'?
Suggestion: whereby
...ocess, but the contribution and efforts where by the people who took the photographs. Th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...tributions to the field than an expert. However an expert should guide them in an deter...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an deterministic fashion" with adverb for "deterministic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rt. However an expert should guide them in an deterministic fashion to makes results likely.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 171, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... However an expert should guide them in an deterministic fashion to makes results ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in particular']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252873563218 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0651340996169 0.0880659088768 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0402298850575 0.0497285424764 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0613026819923 0.0444667217837 138% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.10153256705 0.12292977631 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0478927203065 0.0406280797675 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91796156983 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0287356321839 0.030933414821 93% => OK
Particles: 0.00191570881226 0.0016655270985 115% => OK
Determiners: 0.111111111111 0.0997080785238 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00191570881226 0.0249443105267 8% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0287356321839 0.0148568991511 193% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2934.0 2732.02544248 107% => OK
No of words: 475.0 452.878318584 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17684210526 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362105263158 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277894736842 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212631578947 0.200843997647 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.153684210526 0.132149295362 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91796156983 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 219.290929204 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498947368421 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 57.6635127516 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5909090909 23.380412469 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7685763746 59.4972553346 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 141.124799967 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5909090909 23.380412469 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.545454545455 0.674092028746 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 49.3803827751 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.5 1.64882698954 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358744124801 0.391690518653 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149586841143 0.123202303941 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0834432144232 0.077325440228 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.554762371067 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142680476446 0.149214159877 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146911003443 0.161403998019 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530270654622 0.0892212321368 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.387228965446 0.385218514788 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.101237372787 0.0692045440612 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240097926783 0.275328986314 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418110846196 0.0653680567796 64% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.