23% Users answered correctlyClaim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalisation through new leadership.

Essay topics:

23% Users answered correctly
Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.

Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalisation through new leadership.

Claim which states, in any field - business, politics, education, government, those who are in power should step down after five years of their tenure. This is a logical claim which has been made and reason that revitalisation is required for any of the above field to flourish under the new leadership, definitely is making sense. Though there are few problems in the claim, I would like to stand for the five year tenure based leadership which can promote the field and bring in new ideas to flow and nurture the growth in fruitful way.

Firstly, the importance of this approach is, let's take politics as an example, from National to State, State to District or County, then internal wards and small councils every individual groups is already comprised with elder leaders who are taking the system. This makes the system more vulnerable to bribes and venal which leads the system in an immoral way. The ideas which is being brought by the people are also prejudiced at points. While the tenure based leadership can pay a way to remove this immoral activity by making people cautious about the act. Personnels will try to be honest and bring new ideas in to the system for the well being of the system. Since the bribes or immoral activity can cause damage to their tenure, most of the illegitimate issues will wane, which leads to pure and clean system.

Secondly, current education system with olden ideas can be rejuvenated by spectrum of new ideas. During my schooling when my principal changed, a new and young energetic principal came to administer the school. We got new tennis ground, new sport equipments, he brought a lot of extra curricular activities in the school. Also the change led to strict examinations and more practical classes for the STEM subjects. the awareness about the present educational system was well read by our new principal who brought immense changes to school in just one year. So when a new person comes in to a predominant position, changes which he/she can bring to the system is irreproachable.

Despite of the pros, there are certain cons about the claim. Since the most experienced person in the seat being changed to a new person, there is a probability for a turmoil in the system. Even though the new person is agile and adept in the field, he/she should be having some relevant experience in the system before taking the seat. If the approach comes into picture, there should be a strict policy of making people who are adept and having handy experience in the system should be appointed as the replacing body.

In conclusion, as I stated above the pros and cons always exist in any claim. But the claim can provide a bigger change if it comes into act. Though there are some problems, this has more merits then the demerits. Therefore it is more sensible to follow this approach of leadership in any of the above field.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an immoral way" with adverb for "immoral"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...bribes and venal which leads the system in an immoral way. The ideas which is being brought by th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e people are also prejudiced at points. While the tenure based leadership can pay a w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ra curricular activities in the school. Also the change led to strict examinations a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ractical classes for the STEM subjects. the awareness about the present educational...
^^^
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...are some problems, this has more merits then the demerits. Therefore it is more sens...
^^^^
Line 9, column 215, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...this has more merits then the demerits. Therefore it is more sensible to follow this appr...
^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'in conclusion']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243144424132 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.155393053016 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.091407678245 0.0880659088768 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0292504570384 0.0497285424764 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0201096892139 0.0444667217837 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118829981718 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0402193784278 0.0406280797675 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.48689239748 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0329067641682 0.030933414821 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0018281535649 0.0016655270985 110% => OK
Determiners: 0.127970749543 0.0997080785238 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0237659963437 0.0249443105267 95% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0237659963437 0.0148568991511 160% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2875.0 2732.02544248 105% => OK
No of words: 499.0 452.878318584 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76152304609 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.334669338677 0.366273622748 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.208416833667 0.280924506359 74% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.138276553106 0.200843997647 69% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0941883767535 0.132149295362 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48689239748 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 219.290929204 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48496993988 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 56.3837479347 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6956521739 23.380412469 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.187919797 59.4972553346 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 141.124799967 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6956521739 23.380412469 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.608695652174 0.674092028746 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 42.5373355406 51.4728631049 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.96428571429 1.64882698954 119% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325539927932 0.391690518653 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118266295712 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0910669360927 0.077325440228 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.563206971218 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122117792211 0.149214159877 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12988313987 0.161403998019 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924003051833 0.0892212321368 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.443155089838 0.385218514788 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0228674990796 0.0692045440612 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234893814328 0.275328986314 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108208198866 0.0653680567796 166% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.5995575221 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.