Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
We do not usually learn much from people whose views contradict ours as compared to those whose views coincide with ours.
In this rapidly growing world, we need to keep updated ourselves with the happenings around us. Also, we learn many things as we observe our surrounding. The prompt suggests that, we do not learn much from the contradicting views as comapred to the synonymous views of other person whom we might consult. In my openion, I strongly appose this statement.
When there is a problem or a quibble, we discuss it with our friends or an expert who has the knowledge in that field. As we discuss, we get to know the views of eachother, which might be contradicting as well as simailar. But the contadicting points are the one which matter. These views play an important role in shaping our perspective. For example, if there is a discussoin between me and my professor on how did the Darvin's theory eveolved and why it was refuted by the scientists. While proceding through the discusson we had many common points such as, it was the first theory to explictly mention about the evolution of mankind and gave some supproting proofs to compliment his reasoning. But there we some contradictory statements between us which did'nt go hand in hand. These were the ones that if we personally beleive in this therory or not, as the supportors or the criticizers of the theory. But while scrutinising our discussion, i learned a lot throught the ones which were opposed by my professor and he gave a clear explenation for his statements which convinced me to change my mind, over those view. Through this example we can derive that opposing statements do matter and help in developing our knowledge.
In addition to this, if the person who is not willing to change his contradicting openion and for sure everyone other knows that he is going in a wrong path. Then such kind of stubberness is not profitable. Due to this mistake he might not be able to gain the correct form of knowledge. Even if the contradictory points seem wrong to us, we need to analize those views and correct ourself accordingly, to gain correct form of knowledge. But, if the opposing statement is coax us to commit a wrong doing, overpowering us to divert ourselves in a wrong way. Such kind of views might be an impedement in our path of success. Thus, we should not blindfoldedly believe these statements and try to find out supporting proofs, data before comeing to any kind of conclusion.
Thus we can conclude that, we need to change the way we look towards the contridictory statements made by others, those could be the prime contributors to our knowledge. But there is a catch, we need to critically analize those statements and not blindly believe on those. Therefore, contridictory statements play an important role to improve the database of our knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding happenings'?
Suggestion: the surrounding happenings
... we need to keep updated ourselves with the happenings around us. Also, we learn many things as we obser...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 758, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ntradictory statements between us which didnt go hand in hand. These were the ones th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 946, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... But while scrutinising our discussion, i learned a lot throught the ones which w...
^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ng, overpowering us to divert ourselves in a wrong way. Such kind of views might be an impedem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e comeing to any kind of conclusion. Thus we can conclude that, we need to change...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 33.0505617978 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79449152542 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88032057046 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6136417503 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2916666667 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113148031521 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389394361782 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363140318338 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698628563291 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03545851272 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.