Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Reason: It is inappropriate — and, perhaps, even cruel — to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not being met.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In this rapidly growing world, fine arts play an important role in shaping and expressing views on a perticular topic of interest. It helps the artist to showcase their reasoning on and support their stand in this crouded world. Thos prompt claims that, despite, many of the citizens are hungry and unemployed, the government is funding the arts. I partially disagree with this claim and withstand my reasoning with following examples.
Firstly, the claim states that 'significant number of citizen are hungry or do not have a sourse of income'. The claim does not explicitely mentiones about the number or the percentage of the population that is unemployed or hungry. Or on what basis they have calculated the vague term: significant number. If the exact number would have been mentioned it would completely change the game. If we assume that the maximum population was unemployed or were faceing difficulty to fulfil their needs the government would have taken some approperiate steps to solve the problem.
In addition to that, the method they found that the population is suffering from certion problems is not mentioned. If a survey was taken, then what percent of the population answered the survey. Or was that survey circulatied to the vast population with equality in their status of class(upper, middle, lower). And was the survey anwered with full guarrente of thruth. Beforn takeinng any steps further all these questions must be answered for the givernment to take any actions and to make changes in their funding policies.
Any kind of artform states its siginificance towards an idea of the artist to understand a diffrent perspective on a perticular topic, may ot be a political, social or economical. It plays an important role in expressing the views of the artist, without which it would just go unanswered or would lead someone in wrong direction. So if the givernment suspend funding, the artist would not be able to express their views and depect their idea of understanding.
A society being affected by poverty and hunger is not an ideal example to cherish with. So there should be a well balanced economic funding to sustain the growtn of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ted the vague term: significant number. If the exact number would have been mentio...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...significant number. If the exact number would have been mentioned it would completely change th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, so, then, well, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03867403315 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74213538916 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.997800157 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21052631579 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181154605589 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537119335623 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505423465033 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089663431516 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554397481457 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.