The chart in question illustrates the value of one country's exports in five different categories during the years 2015 and 2016. These categories are: Petroleum products, engineered goods, gems and jewellery, agricultural products and textiles.
Almost every sector registered a profit and a raise in their values between the years 2015 and 2016 except gems and jewellery whose exports dropped by 5.18%. As illustrated by the charts, the highest rise in the product values at the end of 2016 was registered by textiles, who grew by over 15% in a year. The chart reveals that the country's most profitable exports come from export of petroleum products and engineered goods, which jointly earned over $120 billion in 2016, with each earning over 60 billion dollars. Also both of their figures grew steadily by 3% and 8.5% respectively in the period 2015-16. Gems and jewellery comes third after petroleum and designed products and rakes up nearly 40 billion dollars.
The charts also show that textiles category, which was the least earning sector in 2015 jumped dramatically by 5 billion to earn $30 billion in 2016 and thus equaled the earnings of agricultural products, the sector whose growth was the lowest in this period(.81%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes the value of one countrys exports in five different categories during the yea...
^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by 5.18%. As illustrated by the charts, the highest rise in the product values a...
^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t profitable exports come from export of petroleum products and engineered goods,...
^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds, which jointly earned over 20 billion in 2016, with each earning over 60 billi...
^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...h each earning over 60 billion dollars. Also both of their figures grew steadily b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lion dollars. Also both of their figures grew steadily by 3% and 8.5% respective...
^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso both of their figures grew steadily by 3% and 8.5% respectively in the perio...
^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on dollars. The charts also show that textiles category, which was the least e...
^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'textiles'' or 'textile's'?
Suggestion: textiles'; textile's
... dollars. The charts also show that textiles category, which was the least earning s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2016 and thus equaled the earnings of agricultural products, the sector whose ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, third, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12935323383 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64329439756 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7935869784 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.875 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26727789636 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123415864999 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117865654497 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195976852457 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855097362941 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.