6. The table below shows the percentage of water used in three sectors in six different countries in 2003
The table provides the proportion of water usage for dometic, industrial, and agricultural purposes in 6 different nations in 2003.
In overall, it is clear that while Australia and Canada took the highest percentage of water used for domestic and industrial sections, Chinese people consumed the largest amount of water in agriculture.
According to the domestic area, Australia allocated around 65% of water, accounting for the highest amount of water usage among the nations, followed by British with 23%. While Russia, Turkey and Canada consumed about 10% of water on this section, China came last with only 6%.
The case was totally different when it came to industrial usage.It is noticeable that Canada, which allocated 81% of water in 2003 , achieved the first position in the ranking. Although the proportion was also significant in the UK and Russia, the opposite trend was witnessed in Turkey and China,with only about 11% and 7% respectively.
In terms of agricultural purpose, China and Turkey occupied a massive percentage of water, both over 70%. Likewise, it was Australia which came third in the ranking with 33%. Accounting for a trivial figure, British spent the lowest amount of water, which was 2 times lower than Canada and around 5 times lower than Russia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ferent when it came to industrial usage.It is noticeable that Canada, which alloca...
^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...da, which allocated 81% of water in 2003 , achieved the first position in the rank...
^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
... trend was witnessed in Turkey and China,with only about 11% and 7% respectively. In...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, so, third, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17788461538 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68763268107 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8184149966 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1623081231 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742544056548 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615393375766 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108079335673 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503014115612 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.