The alcohol mortality rate of seven diverse countries in 2005 is delineated in the following table. The consumption amount of beer in each respective capital in 2002 is also detailed in terms of liters. The involved countries are Lithuania, Ireland, Czech Republic, Canada, Estonia, Germany as well as Austria. Looking from an overall point of view, it is readily apparent that the number of male deaths is nowhere near as less as that of the female one.
Referring to the fatality rate, the Czech Republic with approximately 1400000 dead people (well under a million and roughly half of it were men and women, respectively), had the highest rate, while the least death number of 125000 was for Lithuania with an ignorable female number of 13000 and just above 110000 males. The mortality rate of Germany was also above a million (1185000) (though was less than the first one) in which the men related number was just below a million (quite a bit higher than the male rate in the Czech Republic) and almost a fifth of it was recorded for women. Austrian associated deaths were likewise near a million with 783000 and 130000 male and female died alcoholics, respectively. The total number was nearly as high in Ireland as in Canada; half of the Austrian one (582000 and 580000, consecutively). In both countries, the number of male deaths was dominant (413000 and almost a half million, respectively), while that of Irish women was a third and for Canadian one was well below a hundred. Although Estonian-related numbers were low, they were not as less as Lithuanian ones. Estonian dead people were a third of Lithuania (either in total or in terms of gender), that is, 332000 males and 51000 women.
Concerning their consumption in 2002, more than a hundred liters were consumed in Czech Republic, Germany, Austria as well as Ireland. Just below a hundred liters was determined for Estonia and near 90 liters was recognized for Lithuania and Canada.
It is completely manifest that the higher beer utilization had the mentioned countries in 2002, the higher fatal rate was recorded in 2005 bar some exemptions.
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 66
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 62
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora Medical experts say that only one quarter of Corpora s citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness even though twenty years ago one half of all of Corpora s citizens me 69
- Many people think that money is the best gift to give a teenager but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion including relevant examples 56
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...02 is also detailed in terms of liters. The involved countries are Lithuania, Irela...
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: COMP_THAN
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
... of male deaths is nowhere near as less as that of the female one. Referring to ...
Line 2, column 1085, Rule ID: COMP_THAN
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
...numbers were low, they were not as less as Lithuanian ones. Estonian dead people w...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, look, so, third, well, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 7.0 357% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 965.302439024 181% => OK
No of words: 356.0 196.424390244 181% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90449438202 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64205664688 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477528089888 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 283.868780488 187% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7065978706 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0650463553615 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281195642121 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0190038650156 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0486986598186 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124860047064 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 40.7170731707 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.