The bar chart below shows the sector contribution to India's gross domestic product from 1960to 2000
The bar graph illustrates about the contribution of different sectors to India's gross domestic product which started from 1996 till 2000. The source of information is EPW Research Foundation.
First of all, in 1960, it is clear by analysing the bar that , the proportion of agriculture sector (60%) was higher as compared to another, that was industry (15%) and services (16%). Moreover, during 1970, agriculture sector was slightly came down with 52% , but their percentage was once more greater than another two, which were almost similar (20% and 22%). Furthermore, again agronomy was higher in proportion, however decreased with little (45%).
On contrast, the proportion of service industries became higher in 1990 (45%) in comparison to agriculture (31%) and production sector (25%). In 2000, the GDP of service sector significantly increased with 62%. On the other hand, agriculture sector became lower (12%), but management became similar to past year (25%).
Overall, agriculture sector played higher role during first year and service industries were in last year in the contribution of India's gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...0, it is clear by analysing the bar that , the proportion of agriculture sector 60...
^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...on of agriculture sector 60% was higher as compared to another, that was industry ...
^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...g 1970, agriculture sector was slightly came down with 52% , but their percentage wa...
^^^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e sector was slightly came down with 52% , but their percentage was once more grea...
^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'greater' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: greater
...ith 52% , but their percentage was once more greater than another two, which were almost sim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33146067416 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78759930344 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3744367036 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267271316336 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117967930539 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142798270441 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207266718282 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133041194419 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.