Some people believe that too many resources and attention are devoted to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
According to the statement, some individuals consider that number of resources and observation is dedicated towards the preservation of flora and fauna. I completely disagree with the statement and reasons are explained in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, large number of wildlife become extinct day by day due to numerous human activities. In this criteria, there are number of tasks which are done by man which leads to hilarious for wildlife. The major cause is pollution. In contemporary settings, pollution become hot topic and this leads to extinction of flora and fauna. For instance, there are numerous industries which are set up in forests. Thus, these industries release plenty of harmful gases in air and chemicals in water bodies. Due to which, wild animals become extinct by inhaling those hilarious gases and chemicals. Therefore, this instance may victims that there are neither resources nor attentiveness which shows towards flora and fauna. However, there are only few numbers of reservoirs which stands for the conservation of wildlife.
Furthermore, the another factor is advancement in technology and manufacture of urbanization which shows that there rae no sources and supervision which devotes to wildlife. In this criteria, nowadays population rates become inclines which leads to the shortage of land. Therefore, human beings become desertifying the forests for the construction of urban areas fir residents. In this manner, legal authorities also do not reflect their concentration towards wildlife. Therefore, by the construction of more land, wildlife become unhome and this also shows negative impression on the food chain. Because food web become disturbed due to the extinction of flora and fauna by follow the criteria of advancement.
To recapitulate, I personally consider that there are only few of resources and manners which are used for the preservation of wildlife. However, plenty of reasons represent that, no one shows dedication towards the conservation of flora and fauna.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ay due to numerous human activities. In this criteria, there are number of tasks whi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...pervision which devotes to wildlife. In this criteria, nowadays population rates bec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
...e forests for the construction of urban areas fir residents. In this manner, legal au...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48562300319 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9812501203 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498402555911 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4535645614 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.3684210526 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4736842105 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0562207902586 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0190805569364 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273382692844 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0415920430229 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233334380581 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.