The bar chart provides information about working-age population and qualifications in Wales in 2001/2002. Proportions are represented by percentage. The box at the top left side represents sex. We can make comparison by sex, qualifications and percentage.
The most noticeable feature is, for GCE A level or equivalent, above one-quarter percentage of males responsible for working share, whereas for GCSE grade A-C or equivalent, took the biggest share below 30 per cent of working females among all qualifications.
For higher education qualification, both females and males took the minimum percentage. For instance, their percentages were 9 and 8 respectively. As people improved themselves, they could raise the percentage of the working population. However, without any qualification, it is surprising that they could earn money for their living. Also, no qualifications percentage scale was between GCE A-level and GCSE grade.
As people get a degree after higher education, they raised their chances to get a job but getting a degree wasn't mandatory or only way to get a job. Because other qualifications' share was almost same as degree qualifications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'qualifications'' or 'qualification's'?
Suggestion: qualifications'; qualification's
...d earn money for their living. Also, no qualifications percentage scale was between GCE A-leve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ances to get a job but getting a degree wasnt mandatory or only way to get a job. Bec...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...snt mandatory or only way to get a job. Because other qualifications share was almost s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, as for, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55056179775 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42372290799 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668539325843 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.5884263785 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3333333333 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183679777246 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726924979659 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928418975927 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116112097431 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114958848968 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.