the bar chart shows the monthly spending in dollars of a family in the USA on three items in 2010
The bar chart illustrates the monthly expenditure in dollars of a family in the USA on food, gas and clothing in 2010. At first glance, it is evident that spending on three items changed considerably in each month.
It can be seen from the graph that spending on three items in January and March had similar statistics. The amount of money spending on food in January was rapidly higher than in March; conversely, the figure for clothing in January was lower than in March by approximately $100. The figure for gas was around $340 in both January and March.
The monthly expenditure on food and clothing in February had the same level, at just under $600, and this figure was double higher than expenditure on gas. In April, monthly spending on food was the lowest of four months, at around $300, while the figure for gas and clothing was the highest, at about $580 and just under $700 respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms changed considerably in each month. It can be seen from the graph that spend...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s around 40 in both January and March. The monthly expenditure on food and clot...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...round 40 in both January and March. The monthly expenditure on food and clothin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 739.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64779874214 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5364242634 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503144654088 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8546452783 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.571428571 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225110573613 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133166278612 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145156175485 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217946669521 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.21703637816 0.0819641961636 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.