The bar charts below give information about the railway system in six cities in Europe. Summarise the
information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the length of routes and the number of passengers each years of railway system in six Europe cities in particular years.
Overall, while Paris had the longest railway line among total railways of cities in particular years, Lisbon welcomed majority of passengers.
It is obviously seen that the longest routes belonged to Paris railway’s system in 1863 with 394 kilometers compared to the shortest routes of Madrid with only 11 kilometers in 1976. This figure in Madrid was a nearly a half of Berlin routes at 50 kilometers. The kilometers of routes in Stockholm in 1990, Lisbon in 1927 and Rome in 1976 was quite similar which were 199,155 and 126 kilometers respectively.
On the other hand, while the number of passengers in Berlin in 2000, Rome in 1976 and Madrid in 1981 were quite low. In a sharp contrast, the railway system of Paris in 1863, Stockholm in 1900 and Lisbon in 1927 witnessed higher number of passengers. To be more specific, in 1927, there were 1927 people choosing to use Lisbon railway service. This figure was followed by Stockholm railroad in 1990 with 1191 customers which nearly doubled to commuters of Paris railway system in 1863 with 775 people. The smallest number of passengers used railroad of Madrid in 1981, just 45 people which was slightly lower than this of Berlin in 2001 by 5 people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...99,155 and 126 kilometers respectively. On the other hand, while the number of p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86637931034 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58180300331 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495689655172 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5746627128 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.9 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0980365690054 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466520126305 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579019683546 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891645091919 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662154482979 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.