some people think charity organizations should help people in great need whenever they live. However, others think they should help people in their own country. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Whether charity organizations should take a hand in supporting impoverished people in large-scale or not has sparked a heated debate in our modern society. while some people argue that they should prioritize on helping people from their own country, I am of the opinion that the duty of these organizations is to take care of impoverished people regardless of their locations.
On the one hand, there are several argument that citizens in the country of charity organizations should be their priority. Firstly, as a rule, the local governments lay a foundation for these associations. In other words, they spend both spiritual and physical values on establishing and contributing charity organizations in attempt of boosting the living standard of people in these regions. This lead to the reason as why leaders of these organizations should focus on helping people in their own country. Secondly, concentrating on people in one regions has reduced the financial burden on charity associations. In this case, they might save time and money wasting in delivery process to people in far regions.
On the other hand, I advocate that it is necessary for charity organizations to help all people in great need wherever they live. A convincing reason is it is a duty of them to equally support people in disadvantaged situations. In fact, in a number of remote countries where there is no financial allowance, most inhabitants are living in poverty. With the aid of charity organizations, these people might enhance their living and contribute to their country’s florish. Moreover, helping impoverished people out of borders and prejudice might raise the awareness of each individuals to take action to bring a better world in large-scale. As a result, it creates a domino effect on all mankind of empathy and generosity.
In conclusion, although some reasons are pointed out to advocate the idea that charity organizations should priority on helping people in their own country, I firmly believe that global-scale support might bring more significant merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... a heated debate in our modern society. while some people argue that they should prio...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun argument seems to be countable; consider using: 'several arguments'.
Suggestion: several arguments
... locations. On the one hand, there are several argument that citizens in the country of charity...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one region', 'a region', or simply 'regions'?
Suggestion: one region; a region; regions
...y. Secondly, concentrating on people in one regions has reduced the financial burden on cha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s where there is no financial allowance, most inhabitants are living in poverty. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.273556231 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11753658792 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501519756839 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0186435649 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476610814637 0.244688304435 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162017349989 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123362079286 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316112070008 0.151304729494 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575063284246 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.