The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of
developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to
2010.
The given table illustrates the amount of funding was donated for developing countries in attempt to support technological sectors by charities in the US,EU and other countries between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, while the total amount of supporting money was increased from year to year, the US was the main donators.
It is obviously seen in the table that the total amount of money funding in technology witness a significant rise, started from 15.7 percent in 2006 then reached to 30 percent in 2010. Besides, the aid money from US was significantly higher than EU and other countries which was 9.7 percent compared with 2.7 percent and 3.3 percent in other countries and EU in 2006 respectively. this figures increased until level off at 22.7 percent in 2010.
However the charities of EU and other countries also growth. The donations of EU countries stably grew from 3.3 percent in 2006 to 3.7% in 2009 then saw a slight fall in 2009 to 2.6%. After that, this figure continuing increase to 4.0% in 2010. The aid of other countries saw the parallel trend. To be more specific, despite a same fluctuation to this of US countries, there was a slight increase from 2.7 percent in 2006 to 3.3 percent in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , EU
...nological sectors by charities in the US,EU and other countries between 2006 and 20...
^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... countries and EU in 2006 respectively. this figures increased until level off at 22...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...til level off at 22.7 percent in 2010. However the charities of EU and other countries...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78095238095 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62416815456 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7365843174 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424301789216 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18416524001 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135216908049 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284035582828 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114535642809 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.