The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the proportions of student’s responses to a questionnaire about the range of books and non-printed material in their university library.
Overall, most postgraduates responded that the range of books was not good, the undergraduates were divided in their responses. The availability of non-printed materials such as computer software, online journals etc. was very good for undergraduates but half the postgraduates felt the library’s non-printed material was just satisfactory.
With regards to the range of books at the library, 32% of the undergraduates felt that it was not good but 68% of them believed the range available was satisfactory or very good. 65% of the postgraduates on the contrary felt range was not good and only 35% believed it was acceptable or excellent.
On the availability on printed materials at the library, 55% of the undergraduates rated is as very good and 33% found it satisfactory and only a small percentage felt it was below satisfactory. The postgraduates had an opposing response to the undergraduates with over 75% confirmed that the non printed materials were majorly satisfactory and 27% even rated it as very good. Only 25% were not happy with the non-printed materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t happy with the non-printed materials.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32994923858 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43947494386 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477157360406 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7822896716 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122272548312 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653809604638 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660470190498 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103086637312 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713555842257 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.