The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017, which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project.
From the given barchart, we can conclude the concert event had gained popularity throughout the years and although other events such as sports and theater do have their own surge in popularity , but the concert event in 2030 had the attendees count resulting to more than 100% of that in 2020.
Sporting events had the least benefits from the 2019 stadium improvement project,with attendance measure crossing the 1.5 lakh mark itself in 2020, it still did not have a tremendous effect such as concerts and the theater.
The theater attendance rose suddenly during the year 2030 only.Despite the project being completed in the year 2019 itself , it's impact was slow and did not look promising much in the year 2020 but during 2030 it's attendees number had unexpectedly doubled more than the previous decade.
Generally speaking , the project was a success as the attendees increased in each event at their own pace.In 2017 ,the count of attendees had not even crossed 2 lakh, whereas in 2030 the combined attendance of the concert and sporting events only crossed more than 2 lakh people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er do have their own surge in popularity , but the concert event in 2030 had the a...
^^
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
...rom the 2019 stadium improvement project,with attendance measure crossing the 1.5 lak...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Despite
...rose suddenly during the year 2030 only.Despite the project being completed in the year...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... being completed in the year 2019 itself , its impact was slow and did not look pr...
^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the previous decade. Generally speaking , the project was a success as the attend...
^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...creased in each event at their own pace.In 2017 ,the count of attendees had not ev...
^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in each event at their own pace.In 2017 ,the count of attendees had not even cros...
^^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'lakh' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'lakhs'.
Suggestion: lakhs
...unt of attendees had not even crossed 2 lakh, whereas in 2030 the combined attendanc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, still, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97802197802 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54433299455 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565934065934 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 22.4926829268 200% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.7252141561 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 226.5 112.824112599 201% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.5 22.9334400587 198% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137459515123 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094425937677 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433573677193 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094425937677 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433573677193 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.8 13.2329268293 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 10.3012195122 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.9970731707 182% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.