The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the news about the count of people using Social Networking sites in Canada for two years.
Overall, the number of subscribers using more than one site has had a surge when compared to the previous year.The percentage of humans not involving them self in any means of media has a slight decline in contrast to the earlier times.
Surprisingly, in 2014 the count of persons using one site was 36% which had a huge fall of 8% in 2015. The measure of the population who never indulge into any sort of networking sites had reduced by 1%. Expect these two none of them had experienced a reduction.
Interestingly, there has not been a dramatic difference in these periods. To the extent the rise has been about 2% when compared to the old times. To the minimum the two sites have only very slight development. The crowd who involve them into four sites has a growth of 2%, five sites also had a improvement of 2% and even three site users have also shown a surge of the same rate.This usage is not a healthy one and these activities should be avoided.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...urge when compared to the previous year.The percentage of humans not involving them...
^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...has a growth of 2%, five sites also had a improvement of 2% and even three site u...
^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ave also shown a surge of the same rate.This usage is not a healthy one and these ac...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in contrast, sort of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58461538462 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53456836915 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0054355636 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164245119284 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691960898676 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752096136702 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120753399936 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817753143742 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.