The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The above chart displays information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in years 2014 and 2015. In 2014, 22% of people haven’t used any social networking sites, 36% of people used one site, 23% of people used two sites, 12% of people used 3 sites, 5% people used 4 sites and the rest used 2 sites.
In 2015, 21% of people used no sites, 21% of people used one site, 24% of people used two sites, 16% of people used three sites, 8% of people used four sites and 4% of people used five sites. In both these years, the majority of people used one social networking site and very few people used five sites.Butt there was a significant drop of people using one site from 2014 to 2015 when compared to the users of different number of sites,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ites and 4% of people used five sites. In both these years, the majority of peopl...
^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Butt
...ite and very few people used five sites.Butt there was a significant drop of people ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the users of different number of sites,
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 632.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38888888889 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15255375178 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 67.0 106.607317073 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465277777778 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.9010489382 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 22.9334400587 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315607154279 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.285347378496 0.103423049105 276% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128551600016 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300280828766 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674979988812 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 15.0 40.7170731707 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.