The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrated the internet surfing in terms of number of sites of Canadian people in 2014 and 2015. Overall it is seen that percentage of people visited multiple sites increased over this period of time.
The percentage of people visited one sites declined by 8% from 2014 to 2015 which is substantial, on the other hand the percentage of people visited 5 sites became doubled in this period. Likewise, 3 sites and 4 sites visitors increased by 3% and 4 % respectively. The two site visitors increased marginally 1% from 23% in 2014 to 24% in 2015. Surprisingly, single site visitor reduced to 28% in 2015 which was highest 36% in 2014.
Over one fifth of Canadian never login in any social media networking sites in these periods and the no visitors declined by one percentage from 2014 to 2015.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ited multiple sites increased over this period of time. The percentage of people visited one...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 671.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75886524823 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68110161905 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54609929078 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.394395126 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8571428571 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202101986091 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113476461735 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443618070185 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152016182835 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027110273339 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.