the chart below gives the information on ages of population in Italy and Yemen in 2000 and its projections in 2050.
The chart elucidates the information about the ages of the population in 2000 and its projections in the year 2050 for Yemen and Italy in terms of percentages.
Overall, it is clear that the populace of older people in both Italy and Yemen had followed an upward trend from the past to the future, whereas younger and mid-age grouped people and projections had experienced a downward trend for the same countries.
In Yemen, In the year 2000, the residents whose age lies between 15 to 59 grew significantly from a mere 46% to an impressive 54% of forecast data in the next 50 years. Similarly, the citizen population during the year 2000 had counted its projections to 2.1% respectively. However, during the same period, the percentage of people whose age is between 0 to 14 years was dramatically decreased from one-half of its total proportion to 37%.
Furthermore, In Italy, the total amount of proportion occupied by individuals above 60 years of age rose significantly from 24% in 2000 to 42% of estimated data by the end of 2050. In other words, it doubled its value within a half-century. Meanwhile, the teenager’s ratio varied close to 3% of its total share. Moreover, the working-age group had dropped its value drastically from 61% in 2000 to over one-half of its overall section.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, similarly, whereas, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8778280543 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9347789803 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552036199095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.401558511 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356800417438 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158958061475 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153787902505 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260744858699 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182447476809 0.0819641961636 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.