The chart below show the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 - 2012.

Essay topics:

The chart below show the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 - 2012.

The chart depict that the crime changes in 3 different areas in Newport city in 2003-2012.

The burglary peaked in by almost 4000 incidents in 2004. After 2004 the numbers dropped consistently to just above 1000. In 2009 to 2012 levelled around 1500 the events.

In 2003 to 2005 car theft was constant just below 3000. A decline happened, where 700 <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">less </span>episodes was registered from 2005 to 2006. From 2006 to 2009 the numbers stayed the same nearby 2000. after 2009 the numbers rose until 2012 from right above 2000 to about 3000 successively.

The robberies remained almost stable around 500 circumstances from 2003 to 2012.It describes the small statistic of problems occurred in Newport city.

In conclusion burglary and car theft had the major incidents registers in the period. However, robbery was practically stable with the lower representation of problem reported during the same period between 2003-2012.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'depicts'.
Suggestion: depicts
The chart depict that the crime changes in 3 different a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed in by almost 4000 incidents in 2004. After 2004 the numbers dropped consistently t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In 2003 to 2005 car theft was constant just below 3000. A decline happened, whe...
^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ize: 19.36px;'>less episodes was registered from 2005 to 2006. From 2...
^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...he numbers stayed the same nearby 2000. after 2009 the numbers rose until 2012 from r...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “after” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he numbers stayed the same nearby 2000. after 2009 the numbers rose until 2012 from r...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...und 500 circumstances from 2003 to 2012.It describes the small statistic of probl...
^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 500 circumstances from 2003 to 2012.It describes the small statistic of problem...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48344370861 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21985093204 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64238410596 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9379599264 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2727272727 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7272727273 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243821204359 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970050560512 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154538033828 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176186634523 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199698868169 0.0819641961636 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.