The chart below show the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 - 2012.
The chart depicts the crime changes in 3 different areas in Newport city in 2003-2012.
The burglary peaked by almost 4000 <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">incidents </span>from 2003 to 2004. After 2004 the numbers dropped consistently to just above 1000. In 2009 to 2012 the incidents that were recorded levelled around 1500.
In 2003 to 2005 which the car theft was constant just below 3000. A decline happened, less than 700 episodes that was registered from 2005 to 2006.From 2006 to 2009 the numbers stayed the same nearby 2000. In addiction after 2009 the numbers rose until 2012 from right above 2000 to about 3000 successively.
The robberies remained almost stable around 500 circumstances from 2003 to 2012.It describes the small statistic of problems occurred in Newport city.
In conclusion burglary and car theft had the major incidents registers in the period. However, robbery was practically stable with the lower representation of problem reported during the same period between 2003-2012.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...os;>incidents from 2003 to 2004. After 2004 the numbers dropped consistently t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...s that was registered from 2005 to 2006.From 2006 to 2009 the numbers stayed the sam...
^^^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2000 to about 3000 successively. The robberies remained almost stable around ...
^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...und 500 circumstances from 2003 to 2012.It describes the small statistic of probl...
^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 500 circumstances from 2003 to 2012.It describes the small statistic of problem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51898734177 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29597988709 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645569620253 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4867184197 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255158225106 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109201333345 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157617204186 0.0843802449381 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185134158119 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194086332683 0.0819641961636 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.