The chart below show the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 - 2012.
<p style="white-space: normal;">The chart depicts the crime changes in 3 different areas in Newport city in 2003-2012.</p><p style="white-space: normal;">The burglary peaked by almost 4000 <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">incidents </span>from 2003 to 2004. After 2004, the numbers dropped consistently to just above 1000. In 2009 to 2012 the incidents that were recorded levelled around 1500.</p><p style="white-space: normal;">In 2003 to 2005 which the car theft was constant just below 3000. A decline happened, less than 700 episodes that was registered from 2005 to 2006.From 2006 to 2009 the numbers stayed the same nearby 2000. In addiction after 2009 the numbers rose until 2012 from right above 2000 to about 3000 successively.</p><p style="white-space: normal;">The robberies remained almost stable around 500 circumstances from 2003 to 2012.It describes the small statistic of problems occurred in Newport city.</p><p style="white-space: normal;">In conclusion burglary and car theft had the major incidents registers in the period. However, robbery was practically stable with the lower representation of problem reported during the same period between 2003-2012.</p>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 628, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...s that was registered from 2005 to 2006.From 2006 to 2009 the numbers stayed the sam...
^^^^
Line 1, column 914, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...und 500 circumstances from 2003 to 2012.It describes the small statistic of proble...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.72222222222 4.92477711251 136% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 5.59679140884 2.65546596893 211% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648148148148 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.142822046 43.030603864 282% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 181.5 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172658799826 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806330618664 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551297984834 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172658799826 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.7 13.2329268293 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.99 11.4140731707 193% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.