The charts below the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the average number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sit-down restaurant per family.
The charts depict the amount of money a family have spent in meals cooked at home, in a fast food or sit-down restaurant. The bars illustrate the numbers of visits they had in fast food or sit down restaurant.
In the decade of 1985 to 1995 the most common practice was cook the meals at home 90% and 85% respectively. The sit-down restaurant and fast food were visited 20 times in 1980 and around 30 times in 1990 in each restaurants.
home - made food in 2005 was represented by 65%of the budget. The meals at the fast food and sit down stayed constant on 55 times each in 2000. In 2015 home - made meals and restaurant meals were both 50% each. However, sit-down restaurant was visited 50 times and fast food increased to just below 90 the number of meals eaten there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in fast food or sit down restaurant. In the decade of 1985 to 1995 the most c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 times in 1990 in each restaurants. home - made food in 2005 was represented...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Home
...es in 1990 in each restaurants. home - made food in 2005 was represented by ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 642.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52112676056 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38140785987 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 172.8 283.868780488 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1880896151 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.25 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385183895244 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187090814511 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084698731573 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272763373372 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780633851642 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.