The charts below the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the average number of meals eaten in fast food restaurant and sit-down restaurant per family.
The charts depict the amount of money a family have spent in meals cooked at home, in a fast food or sit-down restaurant. The bars illustrate the numbers of visits they had in fast food or sit down restaurant.
In the decade of 1985 to 1995 the most common practice was cook the meals at home 90% and 85% respectively. The sit-down restaurant and fast food were visited 20 times in 1980 and around 30 times in 1990 in each restaurants.
Home - made food in 2005 was represented by 65%of the budget. The meals at the fast food and sit down stayed constant on 55 times each in 2000. In 2015 home - made meals and restaurant meals were both 50% each. However, sit-down restaurant was visited 50 times and fast food increased to just below 90 the number of meals eaten there.
In conclusion what we can see is during the first 2 decades 1985 and 1995 the daily basis practice was home cook. Whereas in 2005 to 2015 rose the meals number in sit-down and fast food restaurants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rant. The bars illustrate the numbers of visits they had in fast food or sit down...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46927374302 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36849739735 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519553072626 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.730163368 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.0 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371426853649 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174512039155 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972469965103 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240480932632 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877319042185 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.51 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.