The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money that expenditure on six different products in four various Europian countries, Germany, italy, france, and britain. Overall, as it can be seen the photographic film almost has the biggest share than other goods, and Britainian people consumed staffs more than the others.
As is given in the chart, in britain, people cost about 145, 145, 160, 165, 167, and 177 thousand pounds on personal stereos, tennis racquets, perfumes, CDs, toys, and photographic film, respectively. On the other hand, the average expenditure on six mentioned categories was approximately 150 thousand pounds. While the rate of money that spend on the groups in italy fluctuated around 150 to 155 thousand pounds. Finally, the last country is france. In this country, the amount is between 150 and 165 thousand pounds. In the last, the tennis racquets was the minimum goods to sell to all six countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... was approximately 150 thousand pounds. While the rate of money that spend on the gro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 774.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12582781457 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69053540145 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649006622517 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7738552308 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175879118884 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705576138137 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773116105782 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141973170036 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390296190668 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.