The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004.
The bar chart demonstrates the figure of money that seven distinguished countries annually expensed for doctor and other worker’s salary in 2004. Overall, it is clear that the yearly pay for the medical worker was always remarkable higher than other worker’s payments from two to three times.
The most significant figure that exactly illustrated the overall picture was the payroll for doctors and other workers were in the US. The amount of salary per year for both hospital’s workers and the others were the greatest number among seven different developed countries with 120 and 45 thousands of US dollars respectively. Additionally, the figure for the payment of doctors was dramatically surpassed that of other workers with almost three times.
France and Switzerland’s economics underwent the approximate figure for other worker’s salaries with the US which varied from 30 to 40 thousand US dollars. However, the yearly earnings for doctors in these two mentioned countries were comparatively lower than that in the US which leads to the most balanced proportion between doctor and other worker’s income. The wage for other workers in Switzerland was about two-third compared to the total expenditure of this country.
Witnessing a similar situation with the figure for the US, these three countries included Germany, Czech Republic, and Italia just underwent a smaller scale which is approximately 60 thousand US dollars for the doctor’s salary and 20 thousand US dollars for that figure of other workers. Lastly, Finland has the lowest number of money spending on pay for doctors and other workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '45 thousand'.
Suggestion: 45 thousand
...ferent developed countries with 120 and 45 thousands of US dollars respectively. Additionally, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48235294118 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.025647131 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8497037367 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.8 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472446537671 0.215688989381 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219296137539 0.103423049105 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775345984279 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326372438016 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372610283241 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.