The chart below shows the average hours spent per day in leisure and sports activities by youngest and oldest populations in the US in 2015.
The visuals reveal the breakdown of data upon the average amount of time spent on a daily basis in leisure and sports activities, the survey was conducted in America, in the year 2015.
Overall, it is noticeable that watching TV consumed the most amount of leisure time for both age groups. While sports, exercise and recreation activities attracted the smallest amount of time spent by elderly people, the average time allocated on relaxing and thinking was the lowest figure of all examined categories.
Watching TV was the most attractive leisure activity among people aged over 75, indicated by a sizable figure of approximately 4.5 hours per day, remarkably higher when comparing with that of the 15-19 age group, occupying 2.4 hours. Moreover, the average time dedicated by youngsters to play games and use computers far exceeded that spent by the elders, with respective figures being 1.2 and 0.5 hours. Furthermore, approximately 1 hour was spent on reading by the elderly people, nearly five times the figure of people in the range of 15-19, which was about 0.2 hours.
Another striking point is that socializing and communicating shared relatively comparable values, with figures evening out at around 0.5 hours. In addition, approximately 0.6 hours was allocated for sport, exercise and recreation by teenagers, nearly tripling the figure for the over 75 age group, which was about 0.2 hours. Noticeably, there was a narrow disparity between time spent by the young and by the elders on relaxing and thinking, which was 0.1 and 1 hours in that order.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rts activities, the survey was conducted in America, in the year 2015. Overall, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12109375 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70339311803 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5390625 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.5340212566 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.666666667 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156466534011 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071936199035 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457096657438 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110149318762 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397330600742 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.