The chart below shows The changes that took place in three different areas of crime in new port city centre from 2003-2012
The given line graph illustrates information about the number of incidents in three various types, namely burglary, car theft, and robbery in a new city center within 9 years between 2003 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that there was a downward trend in the number of burglaries, while that of car theft and robbery experienced a fluctuation. Another critical point was that the number of burglaries was the highest from 2003 to 2006 but this was overtaken by that of car theft after 2006.
In the beginning survey year, the number of burglaries accounted for the majority of roughly 3400, which was followed by a significant drop to approximately 1100 in 2008. From 2008 to 2012, the figure for burglaries slightly fluctuated in the range from 1100 to 1500. Regarding to car theft, the figure made up about 2700 and stay remain during the 2003-2005 period. However, the number of car theft dramatically decreased to above 2000 in the 2006-2008 period, before experiencing a dramatic increase after 2008 with the peak at about 2600 in 2010.
In terms of the number of robberies, it just represented a minority of 600 in 2003, but later it slowly increased to 800 in 2005. after 2005, this figure declined to approximately 500 and nearly stayed stable during the 2005 - 2012 period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...ter it slowly increased to 800 in 2005. after 2005, this figure declined to approxima...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89497716895 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68897350534 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.534291421 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0971770479262 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451382560813 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478245899673 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688788161086 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432321403825 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.