Fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) are the main sources in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind and solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, using renewable energy has gained popularity and replaced fossil fuels in many nations. While I accept there are some benefits and drawbacks to this decision, I would argue that it is more beneficial to use renewable.
On the one hand, the use of renewable energy can be disadvantageous in some ways. The main shortcoming is that people struggle to adapt using alternative sources of energy. This stems from the habit of using fossil fuels in most of the daily activities such as transport and electrical production. In Viet Nam, for instance, 60% of electricity is manufactured from coal. Moreover, most of the cars produced use petroleum to active.
On the other hand, it seems to me that people should use renewable energy because of some undeniable advantages. Firstly, it is an apparent fact that the use of natural energy helps citizens to protect the environment. This is caused by the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions produced from using coal, oil, and natural gas. According to research from environmentalists, the emissions, including CO2, NO2, SO2, CH4 will dramatic decrease by 30 % if people alter un-renewable energy by natural resources. This plays an important role in fighting climate change. From energy perspectives, another advantage could be that this helps governments to meet the energy needs of people. The kinds of natural energy can be used to generate more lots of electricity than that of un-renewable energy. The most salient example of this is the amount of electricity produced from solar energy was double that of natural gas.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that there are several plus points for using renewable energy, although this decision has some downsides.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16487455197 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92471653955 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8715348409 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0625 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268975532897 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954758041185 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541340592767 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153649903249 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637827552682 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.