Films were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?
Nowadays, many people claim that making a film by people has gained popularity and eclipsed producing a film by big companies. Although there are some benefits and drawbacks to this decision, I would argue that it is beneficial to manufacturing a film by people.
On the one hand, making a film by people can be disadvantageous in some ways. The main shortcoming is the quality-related problems. The quality of films which are produced by people often is lower than that of films manufactured by big companies. This stems from the gap in producing experience between big companies and citizens. As a result, these films fail to compete with other films produced by professional film companies.
On the other hand, it seems to me that people should make a film because of several undeniable benefits. Firstly, it is an apparent fact that this allows citizens to produce films in their way. This not only stimulates their creation but also helps the film market to increase in healthy competition. As a result, this contributes to developing the film market. The most salient example of this is 30 % of film manufacturers surveyed claim that the new ideas from adolescents play an important role in extending the film market. Another advantage could be that this provides people with opportunities to choose films. This can make it easier for citizens to select a film that they want to watch due to the variety of film markets. According to a survey per 1000 Vietnamese, there is the majority of people (60 %) agree that since this trend appears, they had known new various film types.
In conclusion, although there are many minus points of this trend, I am of the opinion that this trend has several notable benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'manufacture'?
Suggestion: manufacture
... I would argue that it is beneficial to manufacturing a film by people. On the one hand, m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, in conclusion, in short, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93127147766 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82202000333 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529209621993 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6612030912 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6875 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422685615605 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157980656572 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728137266952 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273347751227 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884816697171 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.