The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, in several nations, using social networking has gained popularity and eclipsed traditional communication. Although this trend is not without disadvantages, the upsides will justify these.
The opinion on to get using social network is disadvantageous to some extent. The main shortcoming is that replacing traditional communication makes citizens lack opportunities for real interactions, such as eye contact, body language, and emotional expression. As a result, the community reduces communication and social skills. Besides, with people using social media, they can encounter health problems for instance nearsightedness, and headaches. This stems from them devote too much time to contact with the blue light of smartphone or laptop.
On the other hand, it seems to the large of people using social networks because of some undeniable benefits. Firstly, it is vital that using social networking enables citizens to communicate everywhen and everywhere. This is necessary for people who fail to directly meet because of geographical distance or weather. This helps them to exchange information and remain social relationships. Secondly, online interaction makes it easier for students to learn because a lot of lessons are public on social networking websites. Therefore, students can have free access to online classes on such sites and learn new knowledge.
In conclusion, this trend brings more benefits than drawbacks to society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reduces'' or 'redux's'?
Suggestion: reduces'; redux's
...expression. As a result, the community reduces communication and social skills. Beside...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 215.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79069767442 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15616268574 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646511627907 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4954164547 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.9285714286 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3571428571 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152755947513 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545514611844 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477465612898 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759954677293 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529980728391 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.71 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.