The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides information about the alteration of three types of crime in Newport city center over a nine-year period from 2003 to 2012.
Overall, while the greatest change occurred in the number of burglaries, incidents of robberies remained low but steady. It is remarkable that car theft rose and had the biggest number of incidents in 2012.
In 2003, it can be seen that burglary was the most common crime with around 3400 reported cases. The year 2004 witnessed an increase in the number of burglaries and reached a peak of approximately 3800. However, this figure plummeted and stood at just over 1000 incidents until 2008. This went up marginally in 2009, then continued to fluctuate for the remaining period.
In 2003, the number of cars being stolen was about 2800 and followed a similar trend to burglary until 2006. This dropped dramatically at just over 2000 incidents, but in the following years, the trend was generally upwards. When it comes to robbery, this has always been a petty crime in the center of Newport throughout the years. The number of offenses committed changed a little over nine years. Furthermore, the data for 2003 is exactly the same as that in 2012, at around 520 incidents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he biggest number of incidents in 2012. In 2003, it can be seen that burglary wa...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that in 2012, at around 520 incidents.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89423076923 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57173343677 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610576923077 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2751900936 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.8333333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147134433374 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525191768708 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693706926161 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106244944195 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887615052433 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.