The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006.
The bar chart illustrates worldwide sales of 4 different types of electronical games (mobile phone games, online games, console games and handheld games) during 7-year period from 2000 to 2006. Units are measured in billions of dollars.
Overall, by far the most money was spent on handheld games every year during the period given. The number of sales of handheld games, mobile phone games and online games increased while console games’ sales decreased over the seven years.
In 2000 merely console and handheld games were sold globally, starting at around 6 billion and approximately 11 billion, respectively. The sales of handheld games grew continually, reaching its peak at 17 billion in the final year. On the other hand, the sales of console games experienced opposite trend, dropping over the 7 years and hitting a low of 3 billion in 2006.
In regards of the sales of online and mobile phone games which began in 2001 and 2002, the amount was at just 0.5 billion and 1 billion, respectively. The sale for both games increased fixedly peaking in the final year (for mobile phone games at around 7 billion and online games at 9 billion).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...nd hitting a low of 3 billion in 2006. In regards of the sales of online and mobile phone ga...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92268041237 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49976617038 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2762068659 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229218893352 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111937687471 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855611214823 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173175980718 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697418690494 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.