The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart highlights information about the frequency of consuming fast food at restaurants among people in the USA over the period of 10 years starting from 2003.
Overview, a significant percentage of Americans eating out at fast-food restaurants once a week and one or twice a month was seen during the period as opposed to the others occurred in such times.
As can be seen from the chart, In 2003, the group that ate out at fast-food restaurants the least frequently went every day. In 2003, 31% of Americans ate at a fast-food restaurant once a week, which was 27% more than the percentage of diners who went every day. The group that ate out once or twice a month saw the biggest increase at 25% in 2006 to 33% in 2013. The year 2006 witnessed the highest percentage of Americans eating at fast-food restaurants at 20% as opposed to 16% and 17% in 2003 and 2013, respectively.
Looking at the chart in more detail, there was an equal proportion of people ate at fast-food restaurants solely a few times every year at 15% both in 2006 and 2013 while the rate stood at 13% in 2003. In addition, there was the number of Americans who rarely or never ate fast-food over the period mentioned and such exception was also seen in the proportion of diners eating out at fast-food restaurants every single day in 2006 and 2013.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...period of 10 years starting from 2003. Overview, a significant percentage of Am...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the others occurred in such times. As can be seen from the chart, In 2003, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60669456067 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6268620833 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464435146444 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.3637521945 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22896572512 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135513821985 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531632096482 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164646192278 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584085393941 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.