The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The data in the chart depicts the comparison between average residential cost in several cities namely New York, Madrid, Frankfurt, Tokyo and London in the time period of 1990-1995 and 1989.
Overall, approximately, maximum rise and minimum drop in house prices had been occured in London and Tokyo while slight change in fall or rise in house prices was being there in Madrid and Frankfurt.
Cost of homes in the New York had decreased to 5% in the five-year period from 1990 to 1995 and increased by the same percent in 1996 to 2002. In the same way, Prices in London upsurged to around 12% in year range 1996-2002. Conversely, it dipped to 7% in 1990 to 1995 compared to prices in 1982.
On the other hand, average house prices never augmented in the year range 1996-2002 but only decreased in Tokyo. It was reduced to roughly 7% between 1990-1995, inclusive and 5% in 1996-2002. Besides, residential living cost had always ballooned in the entire time period from 1990 to 2002 by approximately 2%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y 7% between 1990-1995, inclusive and 5% in 1996-2002. Besides, residential livin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, so, while, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81034482759 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57459077093 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545977011494 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3249392876 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249287930349 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114864344627 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465296401111 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153940931908 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169332636263 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.