The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The bar chart compares how many airplane passengers travelled to New York City by three popular airports over the course of 5 years from 1995 to 2000.
Overall, all three airports witnessed an upward trend in the number of yearly visitors to New York city. It is noticeable that Laguardia was the most popular airport to welcome the biggest number of travellers than others.
As can be seen in the bar chart, Laguardia accounted for 35 million visitors in 1995, which was nearly twice as much as that of Neward, only at 16 million. At the end of the survey, Laguardia airport was almost double than that in 1995, at 68 million people. While Neward experienced a roughly threefold increase of 42 million in 1998, compared to the figure at the beginning of the period surveyed. This trend still levelled off in the remainder of the survey.
Although John F. Kenedy airport observed a similar upward trend during the timescale, there was a slight fluctuation in the number of visitors. In 1995, the number of people who chose John F. Kenedy for their trips was 28 million, gathering pace to 48 million in 1997 before losing its momentum to 32 million in 1999. Positively, in 2000, John F. Kenedy witnessed a considerable recovery, with 45 million passengers to New York City.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80090497738 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55421748185 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58371040724 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1664415163 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6153846154 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 5.23603664747 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251944295491 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913813021647 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966795642851 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191949102297 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114555228794 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.