The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph depicts information on the different modes of transportation to and from school by children ages 5 to 12. The study covers a period of 1990 and 2010.
Overall, most of the school-aged children preferred walking to school in 1990 while cars were the least. However, in 2010, most of them chose automobiles as their way of transport while the least was cycling.
In detail, in 1990, over 12 Million of the children went to and from school on foot which was followed by travelling in a bus with about 7 Million. Half the figure of those who preferred walking was recorded for cycling and a combination of walking and commuting using a bus. The least taken mode of transportation was accounted for cars with over 4 Million of travels.
Conversely, ten years after, automobiles became the most useful way of travelling to and from educational institutions with over 11 Million of travels while more than half its figure was noted for those who chose to walk. Riding a bus or a combination of it with walking had about 5 Million and 4 Million, respectively. Bicycles, which were more preferred over cars in 1990, is now the least among all other mode of transportation with 2 Million of travels.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77725118483 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82924495757 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502369668246 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5808444159 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173175553785 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874972534199 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649672188112 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142343501295 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750610092702 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.