The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph provides information about how many journeys were taken by children in a nation in two separate years (1990 and 2010) to go to school and come back from school by using 5 different transportation choices.

Overall, it can be seen that most of the students prefer to travel by walking in 1990 whereas the most popular transportation mode which was used by the students was car passenger in 2010.

Looking at the bar graph in more detail, it is evident that the number of journeys which were taken by students to go to and from school by walking stood at over 12 million in 1990, which was the highest figure of the whole chart, compared to 6 million in 2010. The number of journeys which were taken by children to go to school and come back from school by cycling in 1990 was higher than in 2010, at just over 6 million and 2 million respectively.

Turning to the remaining data, the number of bus journey which were taken by students in 1990 stood at approximately 7 million as opposed to around 5 million in 2010. Car passenger journeys and walking and bus journeys which were taken by students in 1990 was just over 4 million and nearly 6 million, respectively. By 2010, the former had increased significantly to around 11 million and the latter had decreased to around 3 million.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ys were taken by children in a nation in two separate years 1990 and 2010 to go t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5811965812 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61683664513 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431623931624 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.1367072249 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.142857143 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169321935247 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992258945319 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650092767039 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130600269594 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601082006376 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.