Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own
knowledge or experience.
These days, people want more to change their learning resources for use the most efficient learning type. There are those who say that learning from the past has not value for people who live in the present, however others believe that learning from past will never lost its value. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and provide my overall opinion.
Generally speaking, there re a wide range of reasons why people believe that learning from history has no value for us. Perhaps, the main reason of this idea is that the world has changed incredibly. Unlike in the past, people today live in peace and they have many opportunities to make their goals. There is no requirment to learn from past because today world’s conditions have totally changed.
A further point in favour of this idea is that we should look to the future with confidence. This is because the past is past, there will be no key point from past. If we could not spend time on the past for learning about our future, we would not waste any time to spend on unnecessary issues.
Despite these argumentsi there is also a case for the idea that learning from the past has remained valuable for us. A good illustration of this is that science of history. If we look at the units in history, we can clearly see that history has repeated till now and it will be repeated for centuries so we have too much information to learn from the past. Secondly, it is evident that experience never tells lies. All researches which is completed in all around the world rely on past researches. As a result, the past insights today researches and it will forever.
In conclusion, it must be said that learning from past has become a complex issue with no easy solutions. Having considered both sides of the argument, I believe quite strongly that learning about the past has value for us in the president and it will have value for many centuries. If we do not look at the past for making predictions about the future, we can not predict the future.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'valued'.
Suggestion: valued
...say that learning from the past has not value for people who live in the present, how...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is because the past is past, there will be no key point from past. If we could n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5867768595 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38883801532 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479338842975 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9435445615 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6315789474 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292946310965 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944860956487 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751964039868 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185538120782 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345639969743 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'valued'.
Suggestion: valued
...say that learning from the past has not value for people who live in the present, how...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is because the past is past, there will be no key point from past. If we could n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5867768595 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38883801532 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479338842975 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9435445615 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6315789474 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292946310965 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944860956487 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751964039868 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185538120782 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345639969743 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.