You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
Write at least 150 words.
The chart below shows how frequenly people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisos where relevant.
The bar graph provides information about the percentage of people who went to fast food restaurants with frequency in the USA from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, it can be seen that the frequency of going to fast food restaurant decreased over the period shown.
Looking at the bar chart in more detail, it is clear that the percentage of American people who went to fast food restaurant fell from approximately 4% to about 3% from 2003 to 2006. This figure remained unchanged in 2013. About 17% of people in the USA went to fast food restaurant several times a week in 2003, this data increased to 20% in 2006, and then decreased. In the USA, the percentage of people who ate in fast food restaurants once a week increased slighly from just over 30% to about 32% between 2003 and 2006, after that, this figure plunged to 26% in 2013.
Turning to the remaining data, 30% of America people ate in fast food restaurants once or twice a month in 2003. After a decrease, this figure increased enormously to around 33%, which is the highest data of the graph. The percentage of American population who ate in fast food restaurants increased from about 13% to 15% between 2003 and 2013. Finally, the percentage of American people who have never gone to fast food restaurants to eat fell from 5% to about 4% from 2003 to 2013.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57627118644 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52478378879 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423728813559 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5581954505 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300417304335 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155839598342 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664559601696 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204489902361 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760786631544 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.