The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart represents the information about the number of travel to and from school by children aged from 5 to 12 in the year 1990 and 2010 using different transportation methods.
Overall, it can be seen that Walking was mostly prefered by the children in 1990. Whereas, Car passenger was the least choice of the children but by the 2010 Car passenger was at the peak of than other modes of transportation.
In the year 1990, Children used to walk more back and forth to the school as it has approximately 12.2 millions trips per year was done. While bus, cycling, and walking and bus only had about 7 millions,6.1 millions and 5.9 milliions respectively. On the other hand, Car passenger was the least favourite on for the children.
In contrast to 2010, Car passenger shows dramatic increase in the number of trips reaching around 11 millions while Walking had dropped halve a millions from 12 to 6 millions by 2010. Other modes of transportation like bus, walking and bus are still below 6 millions. Cycling became one of less used transport means.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'a million'
Suggestion: a million
...illions while Walking had dropped halve a millions from 12 to 6 millions by 2010. Other mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a million' or simply 'millions'?
Suggestion: a million; millions
...illions while Walking had dropped halve a millions from 12 to 6 millions by 2010. Other mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78918918919 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76164907701 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3656961317 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25301792554 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107949334607 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959527995014 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178209002141 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109857210553 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.