The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts demonstrates the proportion of engagement in household chores in paid or rented houses in two countries of the UK from 1918 to 2011.
Overall, there is an opposite tendency of households attendance between those who have house ownership and those who do no in England and Wales. While in owned accommodations the percentage of housework attendance saw a noticeable decline since year 1918, the one of rented accommodations grew greatly, especially in the last there years. A symmetrical but entirely contrary development can be seemed in the two sorts of accommodations.
Firstly, the percentage of households done by renters shows a totally difference path with that of households done by house keepers. The former feature nearly doubled the one of households done by house owners before 1961. The percentage peaked at almost 77% at the first year, then sharply dropped two years later. In 1971, the percentages of households in these two types of house living conditions appeared to be the same(50%). In the last year, the percentage of these participants who lived in rented accommodations started to regrow with around 36%.
On the contrary, the proportion of households in owned houses in these two countries shows another tendency. In the first four years, the figure increased in a stable speed, remaining unchanged between 1939 and 1953. The percentage saw an obvious increase in year 2001 with approximately 60%, which is almost the same with the figure one year ago. Although the figure keeps growing before 2001, a subtle decline can be seemed in 2011(about 65%). Basically, in the last year its percentage had risen threefold compared to that of the beginning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'demonstrate'.
Suggestion: demonstrate
The charts demonstrates the proportion of engagement in househo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...o have house ownership and those who do no in England and Wales. While in owned ac...
^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...med in the two sorts of accommodations. Firstly, the percentage of households do...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('totally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('difference') instead of another adjective.
...age of households done by renters shows a totally difference path with that of households done by ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, then, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18613138686 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93669556306 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532846715328 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3578888373 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185058183726 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651159197301 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512954041719 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12564969429 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318628227211 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.