The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The chart provides information about the proportion of people in the UK who consumed five parts of fruit and vegetables every day over 8 years from 2001 to 2008.
Overall, the percentage of women who had fruit and vegetables was high when compared to men and children.Also, there is a similar amount of increase in the percentage of men and children over the given period.To begin, the percentage of women was 20% in 2001 which steadily grew to its peak of approximately over 30% by 2006 which decreased a little for 2 years and finally reached 30% by 2008.On the other hand, the proportion of men and children was constant from 2001 to 2003 and from then saw a similar surge from 2004 to 2007 reaching its peak of approximately 30% and just over 25% individually.The number slightly decreased in 2008 ending with 25% and just over 25% respectively for men and children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
... high when compared to men and children.Also, there is a similar amount of increase ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
... men and children over the given period.To begin, the percentage of women was 20% ...
^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...2 years and finally reached 30% by 2008.On the other hand, the proportion of men a...
^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...tely 30% and just over 25% individually.The number slightly decreased in 2008 endin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 720.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70588235294 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84334008742 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542483660131 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 8.94146341463 22% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 76.0 22.4926829268 338% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 273.0 43.030603864 634% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 360.0 112.824112599 319% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 76.5 22.9334400587 334% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 21.0 5.23603664747 401% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25600724715 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283728530694 0.103423049105 274% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145215292796 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283728530694 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145215292796 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 39.0 13.2329268293 295% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 11.26 61.2550243902 18% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 30.6 10.3012195122 297% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.22 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 32.4 10.9970731707 295% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 31.0 11.0658536585 280% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.